Alternatively (i.e. as an alternative twist and spin to) this theory (or Theory Number 2a), for the Singularity to be quantum absolutely nothing vacuum while at the same perpetual duration of non time in no where, not to be an absolute vacuum (i.e. absolutely nothing) is by (or through) this Singularity of an quantum absolutely nothing vacuum existing forever in perpetuity eternally through the perpetual duration of non time somewhere in non existence space (i.e. in no where), in some all encompassing field or fields (of non quantum andor of anti quantum andor whatever, any, some or all being not absolute nothing, if there are any such) spread out completely covering the infinity of non existence space (i.e. of no where) through the perpetual duration of no duration (i.e. non existence time). This field or these fields (of whatever) existed everywhere in non existence space (i.e. no where) covering everywhere of non existence space (i.e. no where) forever in perpetuity eternally of no duration (i.e. in non existence time). This is because neither space nor time had yet to exist before the Big Bang.
This field (or these fields) is obviously not and must not be absolutely nothing (i.e. an absolute vacuum) but yet is a quantum absolute nothing vacuum so as to allow for the one dimensional point Singularity quantum absolute nothing vacuum to exist somewhere in no where (or non existent place of non existent space) for the perpetual duration of no duration (or non existent time) as a singularity one dimensional point quantum absolute nothing vacuum that is not an absolute vacuum (i.e. absolutely nothing).
And this Singularity of a one dimensional point of a quantum absolute nothing vacuum (or nearly almost vacuum) had existed forever in perpetuity eternally without time in some place without space except that together with it there may have been a field or some fields of non absolute vacuum (i.e. non absolute nothing) also existing forever in perpetuity eternally without time in some place without space.
Then 12 to 14 billion earth years ago this very small dense ball of gas expanded (but never exploded) for whatever reasons to finally become our universe of which we live in one of its planet, the planet earth today.
Prior To 14 Billion Earth Years Ago
Therefore in order for the Big Bang to happen some 12 to 14 billion earth years ago, somehow: a Singularity one dimension point of quantum absolutely nothing vacuum; or a Singularity one dimension point of energy or a mega dense ball of energy; or a mega super dense (one, two or three dimensional) ball of gas (i.e. plasma); or a mega super dense ball of matter must miraculously (or magically, paranormally or in anomaly, if you prefer one of these other terms) manage to miraculously (or magically, paranormally or in anomaly, if you prefer one of these other terms) miraculize (or magicalize, paranormalize or anomalize, if you prefer any of these other terms) itself to exist forever in perpetuity eternally somewhere in non existent space for a perpetual period of time in non existent time.
OK (added in on 2015 10 11), for the clueless who are just totally unable to put two and two together, which would include all the proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of science and their minions worshipers, let us just elaborate what the most modern, the most uptodate science is saying.
But scientists being the mega ego super gorgers they are, they totally deliberately pretend to be stupid so they don't have to ‘eat humble pie’ (or ‘eat crow’) and be forced to have to admit that they have been totally wrong about the supernatural and the magical. So they come up with (i.e. invent) all these scientific terms to say the exact same thing but decreed and declared it as supreme mega super genius scientific discoveries and knowledge enlightenment. So then very naturally the supernatural and magical are only infallible facts and truths if and only if they originates (comes into existence or come into being) and were created in/from and by the Big Bang whether of absolute nothing or of a super dense ball of energy or of a super dense ball of plasma gas. This supernatural or magical must not be of, come from or be created by the absolutely, totally, preposterously, ridiculous concept of an all knowing, all powerful intelligent Creator.
12 to 14 Billion Earth Years Later
2. It's official: The universe is slowly dying
3. It's Official: The Universe Is Dying Slowly
4. ‘The Universe Is Slowly Dying’
5. Massive Study Confirms Our Universe Is 'Slowly Dying'
6. Falling energy levels in galaxies mean the Universe is slowly dying, say astronomers
7. Fading cosmos quantified in 21 colours
Did our universe that produced our planet earth really started out from a Big Bang of not an explosion but an expansion, from out of a quantum vacuum absolutely nothing Singularity one dimensional point, a dense ball or Singularity of energy, or a dense ball of gas some 12 to 14 billion earth years ago? Our men and women of science are all very sure it did to the point that it had become an implicit absolute infallible fact. And as of 11 August 2015 or earlier, they are all very sure to the point that it has become an implicit absolute infallible truth that our universe is slowly dying.
So here is my point. If a group of people, all of whom are the brightest minds alive today comes up to you and tell you that you are just the accidental horribly gone wrong product (i.e. whether the dream or the ambition or the whatever) of a Singularity one dimensional point of absolutely nothing (i.e. a quantum vacuum) or almost absolutely nothing (i.e. a quantum near almost vacuum); or even a dense ball of energy or gas just a fraction of an inch across, that was at a time before there was time at a place before there was anywhere, but then there is this me (who is practically a nobody of no account) telling you that you are just like everyone you see around you and interact with you in the course and process of your life, all of whom have been born through a chain of processes ordained (determined and set in motion) by a supreme all powerful all knowing intelligent CREATOR of all things, who would you choose to believe? Would you believe all the brightest minds of our times or a nobody of no account? This is in consideration that you don't really have any perceivable tangible reconstructable evidence from either (these brightest minds or me).
So here is my point, without any absolute provable evidence by either shouldn't it make sense to you to believe the brightest minds of our times than a no account nobody?
I have written about the three so called Abrahamic religions very explicitly, testifying against them. I have also written about all others generally (but not directly). I have presented that they are all evil (some more than others) anti GOD religions, advancing doctrines and teachings that pretend to obey and reverent GOD but all (especially the two most evil, the two largest so called Abrahamic religions) implicitly ridicule, mock, slander and accuse GOD of being self glorify, unjust and unrighteous, sadistic and vindictive seeking savage brutal torture and slaughter against anyone who don't andor won't believe in HIM even when HE cannot be heard or seen by them (i.e. NOT giving to them any absolute provable evidence that HE is indeed the GOD who created everything). No, of course not, these so called Abrahamic religions, are not directly and explicitly saying that GOD wants to torture and slaughter people (not openly when they are unable to do so), they are only just saying that because they are the proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of God, they therefore must sadistically torture and savagely slaughter people who don't believe in GOD because they want to get people to believe in the Creator God. And this they claimed they do because they loved GOD so much, and they want totally to obey GOD so much, and they want to be the complete slave of GOD so much.
But of course that is not all that they do. There are tons more that is why this work have several blogs and numerous discussions.
But that is not all, there are still more. I am not totally alone in believing in the same supreme all powerful all knowing GOD. There are others, not a whole lot just a very insignificant number if we were to compare them to the major religions of the world and even the less major ones. These others all like me, all have entered in the Covenant with this same supreme all powerful all knowing GOD through the process ordained, recorded in the writings (i.e. Holy Scriptures) by earlier believers through the same ordained process.
Only problem is we are not all in agreement, in fact we are mostly in disagreement, that is why there are over a hundred groups including isolated individuals like me, of these others sharing the same beliefs and having entered into the same Covenant through the same recorded ordained process. They are all saying mostly the same things (about themselves and against others). And this that they, only they and their own group, are the zealous faithful remnants, the truth and agape loving believers while all the rest are lukewarm and self righteous, and that GOD is going to punish them all soon if they (the others) don't repent and turn to join them in their group. Whereas me, I am presenting (i.e. telling, asserting, pronouncing, judging, condemning, if you prefer any or all of these other words) that all (without exception) need to wake up from their lust, their ego supergorging lust thinking, holding and presenting themselves that they are loving, righteous, faithful best of the best, and to fully turn in true humility, contriteness to sincerely seek to obey GOD and honor the Covenant with GOD.
But of course that is not all that they do. There are tons more that is why this work have several blogs and numerous discussions.
So what do you think? Am I doing all these things so that I can ego mega super gorge myself to insanity (as some had claimed)? Am I thinking, holding and showing (i.e. presenting) to all that I am the best of the best, the purest of the pure, the most lowly of the most lowly, the most enlightened of the most enlightened, the most brilliantly intelligent of the most brilliant intelligent and thus the most supreme of all the most supreme proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of GOD? What possible other reasons can there be for me to present a message as truth that go against every other versions of truth (or facts) of all brightest minds of our times, all the religions of this world and even against those who I share the same beliefs and the same Covenant through the same induction process.
So what do you think? Surely almost all of over seven billion people alive today other than the one and only me, they all cannot be so essentially and crucially wrong, leaving me as the one and only one (if there are others I do not know who they are or if there are) who is essentially and crucially right as I seemingly claimed. Surely that is preposterous and ridiculous to a certainty, right?
The main basis of all this author's discussion is to the original inspired text of the Christian Holy Scriptures sourced from material currently (at time of the post) publicly available as ‘translated’ text in numerous version of the Christian Bible, and also the Strong Exhaustive Concordance of the King James Version. The discussion focus and context is with respect to this author's Christian commitment and beliefs through the calling of ALMIGHTY GOD to the baptism of repentance into the Everlasting Covenant mediated by LORD JESUS of the Christian Bible Gospel's accounts.
The referenced sources for all other religions and systems of belief (hereafter referred to as the Referenced Sources), are to materials freely available and published online on the World Wide Web and other service protocols on the Internet. These are published by either: the generally proclaimed, acclaimed and acknowledged experts and masters; or the self proclaimed, acclaimed and acknowledged experts and masters of such belief systems and religions; as well as of all others who published dissertations and discussions on these system of beliefs and religions whether presented as biased or unbiased discussion, dissertations or compilations.
The materials directly and specifically attributed to, as sources that form the basis to this author's discussions topics are by no means all the sources referenced by this author but just a small sampling of such information referenced by this author that are accurate contextual representations of what is widely published.
Anyone who dispute the accuracy or truthfulness of the discussions, dissertations and assertions with regards to other religions and systems of beliefs (other than the true Christian faith and worship of this author) are requested to take the matter up with the Reference Sources.
This author at no point claimed to be discussing the original work of the originators of any other religions or system of beliefs other than the Christian commitment and worship by the Everlasting Covenant mediated by LORD JESUS. All discussions of other religions and system of beliefs are based solely on what have been published and were available prior to the time the discussion was posted, and attributed to the Referenced Sources.
Please bear in mind that almost all the Referenced Sources of nearly all religions and system of beliefs varied their doctrines, assertions and teachings significantly from time to time through the course of human history, as well as by their various and differing members of those who are the contemporary proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of these religions and systems of beliefs, whether they are those generally acknowledged by the human social order and/or those who claimed affiliations to these religions and systems of beliefs, or those who are self appointed. Therefore if anyone finds any discussion by this author of these religions and systems of beliefs to be inaccurate, they should refer back to those materials published on these religions and system of beliefs that were contemporary to the date the discussion was first posted.
Last Updated: 2015 12 02
First Posted: 2015 08 13
© Quah 2015. All rights reserved.