Is God for Real? A No-Nonsense Critical Analysis of The Relevant Issues That Arrives at A Completely Rational, Irrefutable Conclusion That Just Makes Sense.
by Quah Choon Huat
Have you ever seriously asked yourself and wondered if GOD (as the ONE who created all things and us) is real? To then seriously consider through a critical analysis to actually determine the answer?
When I was between eleven and fourteen years old (it was a long time ago so I can't remember exactly when), little old me came to the conclusion that GOD is real. This just from reading the Bible (KJV) and found what JESUS (was recorded as having) said to make complete sense (or to completely make sense). Fact is, when I was between nine and ten years old a thought occurred to me that if we are all going to die, then there is really no point to (our) life.
This means that life is basically purposeless and pointless, if it just ends in death as the end (i.e., the total and complete cessation and termination) of our lives. That life (for us including all life forms) is just a zero sum game. That in gist, was what JESUS said during His ministry as a SON of man. That unless there is a forever continuity of our life, our life is pointless and purposeless (to us).
But no, I did not then do a critical analysis to determine if GOD is or can be real. That should be understandable as I was still more of a child then a fully grown adult. Aside from the fact that I then have no clue what a critical analysis is or is about. Let alone how to go about doing one.
But neither have anyone else in all of their entire lives. Even those who are the subscribing believers of God/Gods and all the religions of the world.
All of these believers just without any serious consideration believe that their God is or their Gods are real. This meaning for all of them, it is all just about a feeling, an emotional connection to an idea. That it is more to do with feelings.
Not something to do with thinking in a considered analytical process. But just some hazy ideas or notion without any clear defined parameters that are connected to any thing real (i.e., has a basis in reality).
Most believing subscribers to religions just inherit these beliefs from their parents or guardians, without question. Of the rest who are new converts (other than those who convert so as to be able to marry someone of some religions) to some religions, the bulk either were introduced to these religions by friends, neighbors, acquaintances, associates, peers, the social circles they moved around in, or total strangers that came knocking or whom they encountered through other ways. Or got these beliefs through some media.
One thing all of these believers have in common is, none of them have ever proven rationally and irrefutably that the God/Gods they believe in are real. They all just "believe" whatever they "believe in" without evidence, proof or any consideration at all.
But that is not the worst of it all. The worst of it all is, much to almost all of their beliefs in God/Gods and religions, are all without basis. Where much of these beliefs, doesn't even make sense at all.
There have been numerous books written to address the question of if God exists or is real. Numerous arguments have been presented both for and against the idea of God's existence. If you have read any of them and have been convinced by these arguments of God's existence or not existence.
But one thing common to all these arguments is none of them are (rationally) irrefutable. They are all just very convincing at best and at worst iffy. If you agree with any of them, it is from your own personal inclination and not by any irrefutable truth or fact.
Fact is almost all humankind (except maybe only me), just believe in even complete utter nonsense without any intelligent thinking or consideration, at all.
Today with all kinds of utter nonsense being published as fact and truth online (i.e., all the various platforms and portals of the internet, especially social media), fact checking websites and channels have sprung up like mushrooms on a rainforest floor after a few days of heavy rain.
Sadly, not a single fact checking site fact checks on whether God as the one who create all things is or can be real. Nor has a single site fact checks all the religions of humankind, whether any of these are from any God that is real. That these religions and their Gods, are not all mostly just frauds or scams.
According to the "Internet" (i.e., AI searches both in Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge for the proof of GOD), there is no single, universally accepted scientific or empirical "proof" for God's existence. But if you think me, the author of this work, can be believed, there is. And this is in my book "Is God of Real?", and never mind if you don't. Just don't discount me off as delusional. At least not until you have read my book, "Is God for Real?".
As they say "the taste of the pudding is in the eating" (which means you can only truly judge something's quality, success, or worth after you've experienced it firsthand, not just from its appearance or description). Likewise, the Scripture recorded in Psalm 34 verse 8, "Oh, taste and see that the Lord is good; Blessed is the man who trusts in Him!".
This is where this book comes in. Not only does this book prove absolutely, leaving no room for rational (rational, being the keyword) doubt, that almost all mainstream religions are just nothing but inventions of ancient ignorant men and women. It also pokes the scientific theories of the formation of our universe and the evolution of the species, full of holes. Exposing both as just complete and total frauds, something made up to senselessly explain away why the universe exists and how the earth is populated by innumerous species of lifeforms.
Which is why this book, "Is God for Real?", is one that anyone at all wanting or even just wishing, to know for a rationally irrefutable certainty and fact if God is real, must read.
Or even anyone who just wants to know (as well as prove) for a certainty that almost all religions are just scams, and both the Big Bang and Evolution of Species of science are just completely bogus "BS".
I am currently sourcing for a book publisher and considering the various options such as hybrid publishing incase no publishers are courageous enough to take up my seemingly very "controversial" book. However hybrid publishing costs tons of money, which sad to say I don't have. If it comes to that I will have no choice but to cloud-source.
My very last option is to self-publish with Amazon™, the humongous online retailer. With self-publishing, I will need to invest in promoting my book otherwise it will just go unnoticed among the tons of self-published titles. This too involves funds which tragically I am in severe short supply of.
■
Numerous books have been published about the existence of God; many of these books are of the religious/philosophical genre. But lately, more and more books have been published arguing that the discovery of science does not contradict but actually validates the existence of God.
One of the earliest books arguing for the existence of God was by Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 CE). His five proofs of the existence of God have become the main arguments of many authors in many publications that expanded or elaborated on his arguments.
1. He first assertion (i.e., claim or admission) was that the existence of God is not self-evident (to mankind, meaning man cannot discern or understand that GOD is behind or is responsible for the creation, aka our universe).
2. Then he argued that motion, causation, contingency, excellence, and harmony are logical and rational proofs (i.e., are the clear evidence) of the existence of God. This means that it is evident in the creation, which of course means that we can perceive and understand from all these things that God exists.
Here is the first problem. From just these basic lines of his argument, he had totally contradicted himself. To first say that the existence of God is not self-evident, then in his "five proofs of God", he basically states that all these five things are evidently evidence of God. Which is basically the exact same thing as to say, "the existence of God is self-evident in all these five things".
I have no idea how many thousands or millions have read his arguments (presented and represented, elaborated upon in many other books since), but no one at all absolute had even remotely discerned or noted that he was basically contradicting himself. What this means is that no one at all even understands what a contradiction is.
This totally explains why over eighty-five percent of humans are subscribers to all the insane religions of humankind. And why our awesomely ingenious scientists (some to most of them) actually asserted that absolute nothing and absolutely everything are the exact same thing in the then newly reminted theory of the Big Bang (circa 2010 - 2012 CE).
Contradiction tells us something is off and doesn't make sense. It is one of the very first indications that something presented is not true (i.e., a lie). But apparently hardly anyone understands it if it is present subtly, even it is very obvious.
About The Five Proofs
The five proofs are basically arguing about the same thing. No doubt these arguments are valid, but the way he argued them was to go around in circles and was just boring. All five proofs are saying just one thing. This is that a cause is needed to explain them. And this cause is and can only be God. But he neither explained nor elaborated on why the cause is and has only to be God.
Anyone who has not been completely duped would (or should anyway) know (i.e., completely understand) that the very reasons science came up with the Big Bang and the Evolution of the Fit (priority, Fittest) theories were to do away with the need for an intelligent, all-powerful Creator (aka God) as the basis to our universe and reality.
That has been why the theory of Evolution is by "natural" (meaning it just happens “naturally and automatically” then propelled by completely by very "natural" accidents, aka mutations occurring in the DNA replication process because it is totally prone to "natural" errors or mistakes) selection.
While the Big Bang theory was (originally when it was first mooted) from an ultra-compressed ball of matter (implied as perpetually existing either as oscillating between an ultra-compressed ball of matter and a humongous universe, in the expansion-contract theory) that exploded into the universe.
Of course, by today, there are numerous versions or variants of this original Big Bang, contraction-expansion theory. As also with how life came about through things that are "naturally" occurring and processes that are "natural" to the laws of physics, chemistry, and biology, from things that are "naturally" occurring in the universe by processes that are "naturally" happening all the time. All of which assert that no God or intelligent design being involved at all. That all these things happened naturally and continue to happen naturally.
Therefore, without these five proofs providing or giving a reason why the cause, first cause, or uncaused cause, is and can only be God, the final conclusion that only God can be this cause, first cause, or uncaused cause for all these five arguments, they fall short and become entirely unconvincing.
(continue reading this discussion of the "Five Proofs of God Existence" by Thomas Aquinas and "God, the Science, the Evidence" by Michel-Yves Bollore, Olivier Bonnassies, in the pending post "Critical Examination on Proof of GOD by Published Books")
◼
Previous Post > Status Updates 2025 August
Next Post > Taking Most Posts of My Blogs Offline (i.e., revert to Draft)
Special Note
Next Post > Taking Most Posts of My Blogs Offline (i.e., revert to Draft)
Special Note
Please note that all discussions by this author are based on a general non expert assessment of information gathered from material published in the public domain (i.e., readily available to members of the general public). All of this author's discussions are presented as material for any and all lay persons with no special expertise. Anyone twelve years of age and older, who is not mentally incapacitated in some ways, would (or should anyway) be able to understand anyall the discussions of this author. No one needs to be an expert or a genius to be able to understand the simple and straight forward truths discussed by this author.
The main basis of all this author's discussions is the original inspired texts of the Christian Holy Scriptures sourced from material currently (at time of the posting) publicly available as ‘translated’ text in numerous version of the Christian Bible and extensively referenced by the Strong Exhaustive Concordance of the King James Version. The discussions' focus and context are with respect to this author's Christian commitment, worship and beliefs through the calling of ALMIGHTY GOD to the baptism of repentance into the Everlasting Covenant mediated by LORD JESUS of the Christian Bible Gospel's and the full New Covenant's accounts.
The referenced sources for all other religions and system of beliefs (hereafter referred to as the Referenced Sources), are to materials freely available and published online on the World Wide Web and other internet service protocols on the Internet. These are published by either: the generally proclaimed, acclaimed and acknowledged experts and masters; or the self proclaimed, acclaimed and acknowledged experts and masters of such beliefs and religions; as well as of all others who published dissertations and discussions on these system of beliefs and religions whether presented as biased or unbiased discussion, dissertations or compilations.
The materials directly and specifically attributed to, as sources that form the basis to this author's discussions topics on other system of beliefs and religions are by no means all the sources referenced by this author but just a small sampling of such information that are accurate contextual representations of what is widely published to discuss, proclaim, assert, pronounce andor decree as the so claimed truth andor the direct communications from the ALMIGHTY CREATOR.
Anyone who disputes the accuracy or truthfulness of the discussions, dissertations and assertions with regards to other religions and systems of beliefs (other than the true Christian faith and worship of this author) are requested to take the matter up with the Reference Sources.
This author at no point claimed to be discussing the original work of the originators of any other religions or system of beliefs other than the Christian Commitment by the Everlasting Covenant mediated by LORD JESUS. All discussions of other religions and system of beliefs are based solely on what have been published and were available prior to the time the discussion was posted, and attributed to the Referenced Sources.
Please bear in mind that almost all the Referenced Sources of nearly all religions and system of beliefs as well as those who discussed andor compiled such material information varied their doctrines, assertions, claims (to accuracy, validity or authenticity) andor teachings significantly from time to time through the course of human history, as well as by their various and differing members of those who are the contemporary proclaimed and acclaimed experts, authorities andor masters of these knowledge, information, religions and system of beliefs, whether they are those generally acknowledged by the human social order andor those who claimed affiliations to these religions and systems of beliefs, or those who are self appointed. Therefore if anyone finds any discussion by this author on these religions and system of beliefs to be inaccurate, they should refer back to those materials published on these religions and system of beliefs that were contemporary to the date the discussion was first posted.
Updated: 2025 12 27
First Published: 2025 08 10
© Quah 2025. All rights reserved
