Addendum (added 2019 03 08 C.E.)
As predicted in this work (please see Special Note) on the totally absolute predictability of human beliefs systems and religions, the scientific belief system in the theory of the Big Bang has since this piece was written in 2015 C.E., been reformulated with new twists, spins and inventions as follows:
1. A new all encompassing (aka all powerful, all everywhere, all knowing Be-all-end-all) theory of spontaneity (as an invention of the unpredictability principle) of absolute nothing to become absolutely everything has since been invented to apply to anyall things that science will decreed that they apply to. Basically, essentially and literally, the theory of spontaneity is science (behaving totally in deliberated stupidity so they can proclaim and decree massively stupid things as infallible truths and facts) arrogant proclamation of their absolute infallibility and therefore they do not need to give any valid explanations, proofs (in facts or truths), reasons and basis to anything their might in their ego mega supergorging lust spontaneously decide to proclaim and decree as infallible facts through attributing them to the totally unpredictable, beyond comprehension and beyond understanding behaviors of spontaneity.
2. Quantum theory aka quantum mechanics, is from now hence absolutely about Absolute Nothing and no longer about something, and also no longer about wacky behaviors (Attribution: Livescience September 26, 2014 06:36 pm ET — ‘Quantum mechanics is the body of scientific laws that describe the wacky behavior of photons, electrons and the other particles that make up the universe.’) but about miraculous, supernatural or paranormal spontaneous behaviors of absolute nothing encompassing absolutely everything as the Be-all-end-all.
3. The Big Bang that began from Absolute Nothing Singularity (aka quantum vacuum) which is now not really or actually (meaning just pretending to be) absolute nothing but still practically (just not literally) absolute nothing in a nanoscopic speck of a (practically, whereas previous to the new twists, spins and inventions, it was literally) one dimensional point of compressed (by absolute nothing or possibly a Higgs boson or field, or whatever other crap that is just absolutely nothing but not quite) energy (i.e. gas whether plasma, anti plasma, non plasma, dark andor bright); or matter and antimatter dark, bright and not so bright; or even whatever else that may or may not, does or does not matter which science will spontaneously proclaim from time to time.
4. The Big Bang theory is no longer a singular Big Bang but of some plurals Big Bangs (as also predicted in this work of the plurality of the Singularity), of other Big Bangs (one, some or many) preceding (before there was a before and before there was a preceding, since time have not existed yet but that doesn't matter because matter also doesn't exist yet) a Big Bang that became our universe.
Screenshot from news article on NBC
(Click on image to enlarge)
Screenshot from news article on NBC
(Click on image to enlarge)
Screenshot from news article on NBC
(Click on image to enlarge)
The Three Versions (as at 2015 08 13 C.E. updated 2015 12 02)
There are currently (as at 2015 C.E.) three main variations or iterations to the Big Bang Theory of science.
Theory Number 1 (The Dense Ball Of Matter Theory). This first theory is both old and obsolete and can no long be believed because it came from a time of mega super unenlightened mega super completely dark (which in scientific speak is not completely dark but just complete dark) age of mega super incredulous ignorance.
The Universe began as a mega super dense ball of matter of ‘undetermined’ size. This mega super dense ball of matter sometime 12 to 14 billion earth years ago then very quickly expanded but not exploded because it was a Big Bang and that is why it is in no way a big explosion.
This is because an explosion cannot be a bang and therefore a Big Bang cannot be a big explosion. This is the same reason whenever someone reported hearing a big bang they are always talking about an expansion. I can never make sense of this Big Bang an expansion not explosion thing (possibly because I am not a proclaimed and acclaimed Superlative of science). But science must have explained it extremely well because all the scientists understood and agreed that the Big Bang does not mean, is not, and never has been an explosion but an expansion which is the precise reason it is a Big Bang.
This mega super dense ball of matter of ‘undetermined’ size had existed forever in perpetuity eternally either as the same unchanged ball of matter until that Big Bang or had been alternating in a never ending toggling between being a mega super dense ball of matter of ‘undetermined’ size and that of being a humongous large expanding universe which would then eventually collapse (i.e. reverse its expansion) back to the mega super dense ball of matter of ‘undetermined’ size.
The universe then after expanding but not exploding from a Big Bang, now after 12 to 14 billion earth years (the reason for the range of billions of earth years is to denote the many different given ‘ago’ times that science has being asserting the Big Bang happened since science first asserted in their theories that the universe began with a Big Bang some over a hundred years ago) has become our universe of which exist the planet earth we live in today.
Theory Number 2 (The Theory Of Singularity Quantum Absolute Vacuum plus variant Quantum Absolute Vacuum Not Absolute Nothing Big Bang). This theory may very soon become old and obsolete, even as it was just mooted, theorized, hypothesized and postulatized a few years ago (from 2015 C.E.) and may no longer be believed because it too will have came from a time of mega super unenlightened mega super completely dark (which in scientific speak is not completely dark but just complete dark) age of mega super ignorance of just a few years ago.
The Universe began as a mega super absolute nothing of a Singularity of a quantum absolutely nothing vacuum or quantum absolutely nothing near (i.e. almost) vacuum, both of which can either be a completely absolutely nothing or a not completely absolute nothing (i.e. an incomplete absolute nothing), or both or even neither at the same time, or not.
Obviously because this Singularity is a zero dimensional point of a quantum absolutely nothing vacuum (or near almost vacuum) it could not have been really absolute nothing because if it had been really absolute nothing it could not have been a Singularity point even if that point is just a zero dimensional point or perhaps even less than zero dimensional if that is possible (which of course only science can know). This is because a point is still something (and thus not absolutely nothing) even when it is just a zero or a less than zero dimensional point. But the Singularity zero dimensional point nonetheless was a true real quantum absolutely nothing vacuum or near (i.e. almost) vacuum. That Singularity zero dimensional point quantum absolutely nothing vacuum (or nearly almost vacuum) had existed forever in perpetuity eternally in some place without space for a duration of time without time. This is because a zero dimensional point of quantum absolute nothing vacuum (or nearly almost vacuum) does not need a place to exist in as it can both exist and not exist anywhere even when there is just only no where, and it does not need a time to exist for a period of time even as it could both exist and not exist forever perpetually without time prior to the Big Bang. The entire and only requirement is that it only just needed to be a zero dimensional point Singularity of quantum absolute nothing vacuum or nearly almost vacuum that is not absolutely nothing (i.e. absolute vacuum).
Alternatively (i.e. as an alternative twist and spin to) this theory (or Theory Number 2a), for the Singularity to be quantum absolutely nothing vacuum while at the same perpetual duration of non time in no where, not to be an absolute vacuum (i.e. absolutely nothing) is by (or through) this Singularity of an quantum absolutely nothing vacuum existing forever in perpetuity eternally through the perpetual duration of non time somewhere in non existence space (i.e. in no where), in some all encompassing field or fields (of non quantum andor of anti quantum andor whatever, any, some or all being not absolute nothing, if there are any such) spread out completely covering the infinity of non existence space (i.e. of no where) through the perpetual duration of no duration (i.e. non existence time). This field or these fields (of whatever) existed everywhere in non existence space (i.e. no where) covering everywhere of non existence space (i.e. no where) forever in perpetuity eternally of no duration (i.e. in non existence time). This is because neither space nor time had yet to exist before the Big Bang.
This field (or these fields) is obviously not and must not be absolutely nothing (i.e. an absolute vacuum) but yet is a quantum absolute nothing vacuum so as to allow for the zero dimensional point Singularity quantum absolute nothing vacuum to exist somewhere in nowhere (or non existent place of non existent space) for the perpetual duration of no duration (or non existent time) as a singularity zero dimensional point quantum absolute nothing vacuum that is not an absolute vacuum (i.e. absolutely nothing).
And this Singularity of a zero dimensional point of a quantum absolute nothing vacuum (or nearly almost vacuum) had existed forever in perpetuity eternally without time in some place without space except that together with it there may have been a field or some fields of non absolute vacuum (i.e. non absolute nothing) also existing forever in perpetuity eternally without time in some place in nowhere.
Alternatively (i.e. as an alternative twist and spin to) this theory (or Theory Number 2a), for the Singularity to be quantum absolutely nothing vacuum while at the same perpetual duration of non time in no where, not to be an absolute vacuum (i.e. absolutely nothing) is by (or through) this Singularity of an quantum absolutely nothing vacuum existing forever in perpetuity eternally through the perpetual duration of non time somewhere in non existence space (i.e. in no where), in some all encompassing field or fields (of non quantum andor of anti quantum andor whatever, any, some or all being not absolute nothing, if there are any such) spread out completely covering the infinity of non existence space (i.e. of no where) through the perpetual duration of no duration (i.e. non existence time). This field or these fields (of whatever) existed everywhere in non existence space (i.e. no where) covering everywhere of non existence space (i.e. no where) forever in perpetuity eternally of no duration (i.e. in non existence time). This is because neither space nor time had yet to exist before the Big Bang.
This field (or these fields) is obviously not and must not be absolutely nothing (i.e. an absolute vacuum) but yet is a quantum absolute nothing vacuum so as to allow for the zero dimensional point Singularity quantum absolute nothing vacuum to exist somewhere in nowhere (or non existent place of non existent space) for the perpetual duration of no duration (or non existent time) as a singularity zero dimensional point quantum absolute nothing vacuum that is not an absolute vacuum (i.e. absolutely nothing).
And this Singularity of a zero dimensional point of a quantum absolute nothing vacuum (or nearly almost vacuum) had existed forever in perpetuity eternally without time in some place without space except that together with it there may have been a field or some fields of non absolute vacuum (i.e. non absolute nothing) also existing forever in perpetuity eternally without time in some place in nowhere.
This Singularity zero dimensional point of a quantum absolutely nothing vacuum (or nearly almost vacuum) then very quickly (for whatever reasons or non reasons) expanded but not exploded in a Big Bang to become after 12 to 14 billion earth years, the universe that holds the planet earth we live in today.
Theory Number 3 (The Singularity/Dense Ball Energy/Gas Big Bang). This is the intermediate version between the singularity of absolute nothing (theory number 2) and that of a dense ball of gas (theory number 4) which is a version of the official NASA version.
The Universe either began: as a mega super dense ball of energy that started out only a few millimeters or a fraction of a millimeter across (whether as two or three dimensional ball of energy whether as particles, waves or both or whatever); or as a Singularity of energy (whether as particles, waves or both or whatever) of a zero dimensional point. Which either then is dependent upon which scientists we listened to and believed.
And this dense ball or a Singularity of energy had existed forever in perpetuity eternally without time and space (i.e. place) but yet still had existed, (for the former) as a two or three dimensional dense ball of energy, or (for the latter) as a zero dimensional singularity of energy.
Then 12 to 14 (or whatever other numbers science may decide at anytime in the future) billion earth years ago this very small dense ball of energy or a singularity of energy expanded (but not exploded) for whatever reasons or non reasons to finally become our universe of which we live in one of its planet, the planet earth today.
Theory Number 4 (The Dense Ball Of Gas Big Bang aka NASA official Big Bang). This is the current theory of a dense ball (or mess) of gas affirmed by NASA of the United States of America (or US or USA).
The Universe began as a mega super dense ball of gas that started out only a few millimeters or a fraction of a millimeter across (depending on which scientists we listen to) that had existed forever in perpetuity eternally without time and space but yet still have existed as a three (or even two or one, if these are possible as indeed anything and everything is possible when only just nowhere and no time existed) dimensional ball of gas.
Then 12 to 14 billion earth years ago this very small dense ball of gas expanded (but never exploded) for whatever reasons to finally become our universe of which we live in one of its planet, the planet earth today.
Prior To 14 Billion Earth Years Ago
Therefore in order for the Big Bang to happen some 12 to 14 billion earth years ago, somehow: a Singularity one dimension point of quantum absolutely nothing vacuum; or a Singularity one dimension point of energy or a mega dense ball of energy; or a mega super dense (one, two or three dimensional) ball of gas (i.e. plasma); or a mega super dense ball of matter must miraculously (or magically, paranormally or in anomaly, if you prefer one of these other terms) manage to miraculously (or magically, paranormally or in anomaly, if you prefer one of these other terms) miraculize (or magicalize, paranormalize or anomalize, if you prefer any of these other terms) itself to exist forever in perpetuity eternally somewhere in non existent space (i.e. nowhere) for a perpetual period of time in non existent time.
Then 12 to 14 billion earth years ago this very small dense ball of gas expanded (but never exploded) for whatever reasons to finally become our universe of which we live in one of its planet, the planet earth today.
Prior To 14 Billion Earth Years Ago
Therefore in order for the Big Bang to happen some 12 to 14 billion earth years ago, somehow: a Singularity one dimension point of quantum absolutely nothing vacuum; or a Singularity one dimension point of energy or a mega dense ball of energy; or a mega super dense (one, two or three dimensional) ball of gas (i.e. plasma); or a mega super dense ball of matter must miraculously (or magically, paranormally or in anomaly, if you prefer one of these other terms) manage to miraculously (or magically, paranormally or in anomaly, if you prefer one of these other terms) miraculize (or magicalize, paranormalize or anomalize, if you prefer any of these other terms) itself to exist forever in perpetuity eternally somewhere in non existent space (i.e. nowhere) for a perpetual period of time in non existent time.
If all the above seems rather confusing andor contradictory andor irrationally illogical, that is only because they really, actually, fully, completely and totally are.
OK (added in on 2015 10 11), for the clueless who are just totally unable to put two and two together, which would include all the proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of science and their worshipping minions, let us just elaborate what the most modern, the most uptodate science is saying.
While science for decades to centuries have ridiculed and mocked the supernatural and all things supernatural and magical (i.e. of things appearing out of ‘nowhere’ such as: bread falling from heaven to feed over a million people for decades; a rock spewing out a stream of water to supply the need of over a million people and their livestock; of time perceivably standing still and even reversing, etc), as utter ridiculousness (i.e. of fables and myths invented by the weak minded and the superstitious), the science of today are explicitly saying that these supernatural and magical (i.e. the paranormal and the anomaly of space-time and the universe) events are absolute infallible scientific facts. These science declared and decreed in their infallible facts of the theories of quantum entanglement and teleportations; space-time portals and wormholes; multi and parallel universe; parallel multi time tracks and the coexistence of past, present and future; and a whole humongous universe that materialized out of absolutely nothing from out of absolutely nowhere.
But scientists being the mega ego super gorgers they are, they totally deliberately pretend to be stupid so they don't have to ‘eat humble pie’ (or ‘eat crow’) and be forced to have to admit that they have been totally wrong about the supernatural and the magical. So they come up with (i.e. invent) all these scientific terms to say the exact same thing but decreed and declared it as supreme mega super genius awesome scientific discoveries and knowledge enlightenment. So then very naturally the supernatural and magical are only infallible facts and truths if and only if they originates (comes into existence or come into being) and were created in/from and by the Big Bang whether of absolute nothing or of a super dense ball of energy or of a super dense ball of plasma gas. This supernatural or magical must not be of, come from or be created by the absolutely, totally, preposterously, ridiculous concept of an all knowing, all powerful intelligent Creator.
OK (added in on 2015 10 11), for the clueless who are just totally unable to put two and two together, which would include all the proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of science and their worshipping minions, let us just elaborate what the most modern, the most uptodate science is saying.
But scientists being the mega ego super gorgers they are, they totally deliberately pretend to be stupid so they don't have to ‘eat humble pie’ (or ‘eat crow’) and be forced to have to admit that they have been totally wrong about the supernatural and the magical. So they come up with (i.e. invent) all these scientific terms to say the exact same thing but decreed and declared it as supreme mega super genius awesome scientific discoveries and knowledge enlightenment. So then very naturally the supernatural and magical are only infallible facts and truths if and only if they originates (comes into existence or come into being) and were created in/from and by the Big Bang whether of absolute nothing or of a super dense ball of energy or of a super dense ball of plasma gas. This supernatural or magical must not be of, come from or be created by the absolutely, totally, preposterously, ridiculous concept of an all knowing, all powerful intelligent Creator.
12 to 14 Billion Earth Years Later
And this universe today according to the latest science, is slowly dying.
CNN, CBS, Scientific America, Newsweek, NBC news of 2015 08 11:
1. 'The Universe is slowly dying,' study shows with unprecedented precision2. It's official: The universe is slowly dying
3. It's Official: The Universe Is Dying Slowly
4. ‘The Universe Is Slowly Dying’
5. Massive Study Confirms Our Universe Is 'Slowly Dying'
6. Falling energy levels in galaxies mean the Universe is slowly dying, say astronomers
7. Fading cosmos quantified in 21 colours
Extract from https://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/10/us/universe-dying/index.html?B070extitems (click on image to enlarge)
Summation
The above then is a concise summary of the very scientific theory of the Big Bang expansion not explosion, of how our universe started out (i.e. was born) as a Big Bang expansion but not explosion for some unknown reasons, some 12 to 14 billion earth years ago. This discussion is an intended humorous summary of what I can and what I can't understand about this Big Bang from the context of what I understand about reality, our existential reality.
Did our universe that produced our planet earth really started out from a Big Bang of not an explosion but an expansion, from out of a quantum vacuum absolutely nothing Singularity zero dimensional point, a dense ball or Singularity of energy, or a dense ball of gas some 12 to 14 billion earth years ago? Our men and women of science are all very sure it did to the point that it had become an implicit absolute infallible fact. And as of 11 August 2015 or earlier, they are all very sure to the point that it has become an implicit absolute infallible truth that our universe is slowly dying.
So here is my point. If a group of people, all of whom are the brightest minds alive today comes up to you and tell you that you are just the accidental horribly gone wrong product (i.e. whether the dream or the ambition or the whatever) of a Singularity zero dimensional point of absolutely nothing (i.e. a quantum vacuum) or almost absolutely nothing (i.e. a quantum near almost vacuum); or even a dense ball of energy or gas just a fraction of an inch across, that was at a time before there was time at a place before there was anywhere, but then there is this me (who is practically a nobody of no account) telling you that you are just like everyone you see around you and interact with you in the course and process of your life, all of whom have been born through a chain of processes ordained (determined and set in motion) by a supreme all powerful all knowing intelligent CREATOR of all things, who would you choose to believe? Would you believe all the brightest minds of our times or a nobody of no account? This is in consideration that you don't really have any perceivable tangible reconstructable evidence from either (these brightest minds or me).
So here is my point, without any absolute provable evidence by either shouldn't it make sense to you to believe the brightest minds of our times than a no account nobody?
Did our universe that produced our planet earth really started out from a Big Bang of not an explosion but an expansion, from out of a quantum vacuum absolutely nothing Singularity zero dimensional point, a dense ball or Singularity of energy, or a dense ball of gas some 12 to 14 billion earth years ago? Our men and women of science are all very sure it did to the point that it had become an implicit absolute infallible fact. And as of 11 August 2015 or earlier, they are all very sure to the point that it has become an implicit absolute infallible truth that our universe is slowly dying.
So here is my point. If a group of people, all of whom are the brightest minds alive today comes up to you and tell you that you are just the accidental horribly gone wrong product (i.e. whether the dream or the ambition or the whatever) of a Singularity zero dimensional point of absolutely nothing (i.e. a quantum vacuum) or almost absolutely nothing (i.e. a quantum near almost vacuum); or even a dense ball of energy or gas just a fraction of an inch across, that was at a time before there was time at a place before there was anywhere, but then there is this me (who is practically a nobody of no account) telling you that you are just like everyone you see around you and interact with you in the course and process of your life, all of whom have been born through a chain of processes ordained (determined and set in motion) by a supreme all powerful all knowing intelligent CREATOR of all things, who would you choose to believe? Would you believe all the brightest minds of our times or a nobody of no account? This is in consideration that you don't really have any perceivable tangible reconstructable evidence from either (these brightest minds or me).
So here is my point, without any absolute provable evidence by either shouldn't it make sense to you to believe the brightest minds of our times than a no account nobody?
But that is not all, hardly. Because I am not the only one telling you that your are just like everyone you see around you and interact with you in the course and process of your life, all of whom have been born through a chain of processes ordained (determined and set in motion) by a supreme all powerful all knowing Intelligence. There are several major and minor religions (but not all religions) that have also been saying the same. Among these religions (both major and minor) there are two very large religions (the two largest so called Abrahamic religions) with around three and a half billions subscribers believers (i.e. discipleship). Only thing is, these two so called Abrahamic religions and also most of the other religions that preached of a supreme all powerful all knowing Creator of all things, preached a totally different supreme all powerful all knowing Creator of all things from that which I testify to.
I have written about the three so called Abrahamic religions very explicitly, testifying against them. I have also written about all others generally (but not directly). I have presented that they are all evil (some more than others) anti GOD religions, advancing doctrines and teachings that pretend to obey and reverent GOD but all (especially the two most evil, the two largest so called Abrahamic religions) implicitly ridicule, mock, slander and accuse GOD of being self glorify, unjust and unrighteous, sadistic and vindictive seeking savage brutal torture and slaughter against anyone who don't andor won't believe in HIM even when HE cannot be heard or seen by them (i.e. NOT giving to them any absolute provable evidence that HE is indeed the GOD who created everything). No, of course not, these so called Abrahamic religions, are not directly and explicitly saying that GOD wants to torture and slaughter people (not openly when they are unable to do so), they are only just saying that because they are the proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of God, they therefore must sadistically torture and savagely slaughter people who don't believe in GOD because they want to get people to believe in the Creator God. And this they claimed they do because they loved GOD so much, and they want totally to obey GOD so much, and they want to be the complete slave of GOD so much.
But of course that is not all that they do. There are tons more that is why this work have several blogs and numerous discussions.
I have written about the three so called Abrahamic religions very explicitly, testifying against them. I have also written about all others generally (but not directly). I have presented that they are all evil (some more than others) anti GOD religions, advancing doctrines and teachings that pretend to obey and reverent GOD but all (especially the two most evil, the two largest so called Abrahamic religions) implicitly ridicule, mock, slander and accuse GOD of being self glorify, unjust and unrighteous, sadistic and vindictive seeking savage brutal torture and slaughter against anyone who don't andor won't believe in HIM even when HE cannot be heard or seen by them (i.e. NOT giving to them any absolute provable evidence that HE is indeed the GOD who created everything). No, of course not, these so called Abrahamic religions, are not directly and explicitly saying that GOD wants to torture and slaughter people (not openly when they are unable to do so), they are only just saying that because they are the proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of God, they therefore must sadistically torture and savagely slaughter people who don't believe in GOD because they want to get people to believe in the Creator God. And this they claimed they do because they loved GOD so much, and they want totally to obey GOD so much, and they want to be the complete slave of GOD so much.
But of course that is not all that they do. There are tons more that is why this work have several blogs and numerous discussions.
So here is again the same point, without “any” absolute provable evidence by either (that GOD is on their side and not the other) shouldn't it make sense for you to believe the world two largest religions with a combined total of some three and half billion believing disciples (because they have the most numbers of believers and the majority cannot all be wrong, right) than to believe a no account nobody, namely me?
But that is not all, there are still more. I am not totally alone in believing in the same supreme all powerful all knowing GOD. There are others, not a whole lot just a very insignificant number if we were to compare them to the major religions of the world and even the less major ones. These others all like me, all have entered in the Covenant with this same supreme all powerful all knowing GOD through the process ordained, recorded in the writings (i.e. Holy Scriptures) by earlier believers through the same ordained process.
Only problem is we are not all in agreement, in fact we are mostly in disagreement, that is why there are over a hundred groups including isolated individuals like me, of these others sharing the same beliefs and having entered into the same Covenant through the same recorded ordained process. They are all saying mostly the same things (about themselves and against others). And this that they, only they and their own group, are the zealous faithful remnants, the truth and agape loving believers while all the rest are lukewarm and self righteous, and that GOD is going to punish them all soon if they (the others) don't repent and turn to join them in their group. Whereas me, I am presenting (i.e. telling, asserting, pronouncing, judging, condemning, if you prefer any or all of these other words) that all (without exception) need to wake up from their lust, their ego supergorging lust thinking, holding and presenting themselves that they are loving, righteous, faithful best of the best, and to fully turn in true humility, contriteness to sincerely seek to obey GOD and honor the Covenant with GOD.
But of course that is not all that they do. There are tons more that is why this work have several blogs and numerous discussions.
But that is not all, there are still more. I am not totally alone in believing in the same supreme all powerful all knowing GOD. There are others, not a whole lot just a very insignificant number if we were to compare them to the major religions of the world and even the less major ones. These others all like me, all have entered in the Covenant with this same supreme all powerful all knowing GOD through the process ordained, recorded in the writings (i.e. Holy Scriptures) by earlier believers through the same ordained process.
Only problem is we are not all in agreement, in fact we are mostly in disagreement, that is why there are over a hundred groups including isolated individuals like me, of these others sharing the same beliefs and having entered into the same Covenant through the same recorded ordained process. They are all saying mostly the same things (about themselves and against others). And this that they, only they and their own group, are the zealous faithful remnants, the truth and agape loving believers while all the rest are lukewarm and self righteous, and that GOD is going to punish them all soon if they (the others) don't repent and turn to join them in their group. Whereas me, I am presenting (i.e. telling, asserting, pronouncing, judging, condemning, if you prefer any or all of these other words) that all (without exception) need to wake up from their lust, their ego supergorging lust thinking, holding and presenting themselves that they are loving, righteous, faithful best of the best, and to fully turn in true humility, contriteness to sincerely seek to obey GOD and honor the Covenant with GOD.
But of course that is not all that they do. There are tons more that is why this work have several blogs and numerous discussions.
Here I am, practically and literally alone testifying against the whole world, presenting a message as truth that is significantly and crucially different from almost everybody else's versions of truth (or facts). How then could it possibly be, that I am telling the real truth while everyone else is not?
So what do you think? Am I doing all these things so that I can ego mega super gorge myself to insanity (as some had claimed)? Am I thinking, holding and showing (i.e. presenting) to all that I am the best of the best, the purest of the pure, the most lowly of the most lowly, the most enlightened of the most enlightened, the most brilliantly intelligent of the most brilliant intelligent and thus the most supreme of all the most supreme proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of GOD? What possible other reasons can there be for me to present a message as truth that go against every other versions of truth (or facts) of all brightest minds of our times, all the religions of this world and even against those who I share the same beliefs and the same Covenant through the same induction process.
So what do you think? Surely almost all of over seven billion people alive today other than the one and only me, they all cannot be so essentially and crucially wrong, leaving me as the one and only one (if there are others I do not know who they are or if there are) who is essentially and crucially right as I seemingly claimed. Surely that is preposterous and ridiculous to a certainty, right?
So what do you think? Am I doing all these things so that I can ego mega super gorge myself to insanity (as some had claimed)? Am I thinking, holding and showing (i.e. presenting) to all that I am the best of the best, the purest of the pure, the most lowly of the most lowly, the most enlightened of the most enlightened, the most brilliantly intelligent of the most brilliant intelligent and thus the most supreme of all the most supreme proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of GOD? What possible other reasons can there be for me to present a message as truth that go against every other versions of truth (or facts) of all brightest minds of our times, all the religions of this world and even against those who I share the same beliefs and the same Covenant through the same induction process.
So what do you think? Surely almost all of over seven billion people alive today other than the one and only me, they all cannot be so essentially and crucially wrong, leaving me as the one and only one (if there are others I do not know who they are or if there are) who is essentially and crucially right as I seemingly claimed. Surely that is preposterous and ridiculous to a certainty, right?
The real point is, what is the basis to believe anything when there are “no real” absolute proofs? Or is it true that there really are no real absolute proofs?
I won't tell you what to believe, you have to make up your own mind. That is the reason you have a mind that can do exactly that, to choose for yourself what you want to believe and (hopefully) to know why you want to believe what you choose to believe. That is right you have a mind capable of rational intelligent reasoning which an all knowing all powerful and infinitely intelligent GOD created so that you too will be intelligent if you so choose but only if you so choose because you also have freewill which means you can choose to believe whatever you want even if you want to believe clear, explicit, outright lies despite being very intelligent. That is one of the implicit purpose of this work, to get people to starting thinking about what they really believe from what they seek and do (in speech and in deeds). And that, if you think the Christian Holy Scriptures can be believed is where all the absolute proofs are as also they have been since the beginning of the creation.
∎
Entry added 2022 05 05
(click on image to enlarge)
Apparently the universe which per the last entry dated 201 5 08 13 (prior to this entry dated 2202 05 05) of science proclaiming that the universe is slowly dying (turning into a cold, dark place), now after some close to seven years is suddenly (soon) to began contracting (and no longer turning into a cold, dark place).
If science is to be believe (and I don't believe them one bit) the whole universe came into existence in a Big Bang. Then in 2015 the universe is going to frizzle out becoming dark, cold and dead. But science did not know when to stop, so now (according to flip-flopping science) it is all going to end in a Big Crunch.
Well done flip-flopping science, no wonder fewer and fewer people are trusting science anymore except those with very short term memory who can't remember what science said (i.e. proclaimed) two days ago.
∎
Previous Post: Passover 2015 C.E.
Next Post: Upcoming Discussions.
Special Note
Updated: 2022 05 05
First Posted: 2015 08 13
© Quah 2015 – 2022. All rights reserved.
Special Note
Please note that all discussions by this author are based on a general non expert assessment of information gathered from material published in the public domain (i,e, readily available to members of the public with internet access). All of this author's discussions are presented as material for any and all lay person with no special expertise. Anyone twelve years of age and older, who is not mentally incapacitated in some ways, would (or should anyway) be able to understand any and all the discussions of this author. You do not need to be an expert or a genius to understand the simple and straight forward truths discussed by this author.
The main basis of all this author's discussion is to the original inspired text of the Christian Holy Scriptures sourced from material currently (at time of the post) publicly available as ‘translated’ text in numerous version of the Christian Bible, and also the Strong Exhaustive Concordance of the King James Version and the North American Standard Bible. The discussion focus and context is with respect to this author's Christian commitment and beliefs through the calling of ALMIGHTY GOD to the baptism of repentance into the Everlasting Covenant mediated by LORD JESUS of the Christian Bible Gospel's accounts.
The referenced sources for all other religions and systems of belief (hereafter referred to as the Referenced Sources), are to materials freely available and published online on the World Wide Web and other service protocols on the Internet. These are published by either: the generally proclaimed, acclaimed and acknowledged experts and masters; or the self proclaimed, acclaimed and acknowledged experts and masters of such belief systems and religions; as well as of all others who published dissertations and discussions on these system of beliefs and religions whether presented as biased or unbiased discussion, dissertations or compilations.
The materials directly and specifically attributed to, as sources that form the basis to this author's discussions topics are by no means all the sources referenced by this author but just a small sampling of such information referenced by this author that are accurate contextual representations of what is widely published.
Anyone who dispute the accuracy or truthfulness of the discussions, dissertations and assertions with regards to other religions and systems of beliefs (other than the true Christian faith and worship of this author) are requested to take the matter up with the Reference Sources.
This author at no point claimed to be discussing the original work of the originators of any other religions or system of beliefs other than the Christian commitment and worship by the Everlasting Covenant mediated by LORD JESUS. All discussions of other religions and system of beliefs are based solely on what have been published and were available prior to the time the discussion was posted, and attributed to the Referenced Sources.
Please bear in mind that almost all the Referenced Sources of nearly all religions and system of beliefs varied their doctrines, assertions and teachings significantly from time to time through the course of human history, as well as by their various and differing members of those who are the contemporary proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of these religions and systems of beliefs, whether they are those generally acknowledged by the human social order andor those who claimed affiliations to these religions and systems of beliefs, or those who are self appointed. Therefore if anyone finds any discussion by this author of these religions and systems of beliefs to be inaccurate, they should refer back to those materials published on these religions and system of beliefs that were contemporary to the date the discussion was first posted.
The main basis of all this author's discussion is to the original inspired text of the Christian Holy Scriptures sourced from material currently (at time of the post) publicly available as ‘translated’ text in numerous version of the Christian Bible, and also the Strong Exhaustive Concordance of the King James Version and the North American Standard Bible. The discussion focus and context is with respect to this author's Christian commitment and beliefs through the calling of ALMIGHTY GOD to the baptism of repentance into the Everlasting Covenant mediated by LORD JESUS of the Christian Bible Gospel's accounts.
The referenced sources for all other religions and systems of belief (hereafter referred to as the Referenced Sources), are to materials freely available and published online on the World Wide Web and other service protocols on the Internet. These are published by either: the generally proclaimed, acclaimed and acknowledged experts and masters; or the self proclaimed, acclaimed and acknowledged experts and masters of such belief systems and religions; as well as of all others who published dissertations and discussions on these system of beliefs and religions whether presented as biased or unbiased discussion, dissertations or compilations.
The materials directly and specifically attributed to, as sources that form the basis to this author's discussions topics are by no means all the sources referenced by this author but just a small sampling of such information referenced by this author that are accurate contextual representations of what is widely published.
Anyone who dispute the accuracy or truthfulness of the discussions, dissertations and assertions with regards to other religions and systems of beliefs (other than the true Christian faith and worship of this author) are requested to take the matter up with the Reference Sources.
This author at no point claimed to be discussing the original work of the originators of any other religions or system of beliefs other than the Christian commitment and worship by the Everlasting Covenant mediated by LORD JESUS. All discussions of other religions and system of beliefs are based solely on what have been published and were available prior to the time the discussion was posted, and attributed to the Referenced Sources.
Please bear in mind that almost all the Referenced Sources of nearly all religions and system of beliefs varied their doctrines, assertions and teachings significantly from time to time through the course of human history, as well as by their various and differing members of those who are the contemporary proclaimed and acclaimed Superlatives of these religions and systems of beliefs, whether they are those generally acknowledged by the human social order andor those who claimed affiliations to these religions and systems of beliefs, or those who are self appointed. Therefore if anyone finds any discussion by this author of these religions and systems of beliefs to be inaccurate, they should refer back to those materials published on these religions and system of beliefs that were contemporary to the date the discussion was first posted.
Updated: 2022 05 05
First Posted: 2015 08 13
© Quah 2015 – 2022. All rights reserved.
